<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Metricology &#187; Featured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metricology.com/category/featured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metricology.com</link>
	<description>Make informed decisions about your audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AdSense Revenue Up 3.5%, Just by Adding Links to Updated Articles</title>
		<link>http://metricology.com/2009/12/31/adsense-revenue-up-3-5-just-by-adding-links-to-updated-articles/</link>
		<comments>http://metricology.com/2009/12/31/adsense-revenue-up-3-5-just-by-adding-links-to-updated-articles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan J Busch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricology.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumerism Commentary is a long-running and well-reputed blog largely about personal finance. I&#8217;ve been analyzing their traffic and making recommendations, and at the beginning of September 2009, I suggested adding more links from outdated articles to their updated counterparts. 
For example, this article about a $100 bonus for opening a Chase checking account was from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/">Consumerism Commentary</a> is a long-running and well-reputed blog largely about personal finance. I&#8217;ve been analyzing their traffic and making recommendations, and at the beginning of September 2009, I suggested adding more links from outdated articles to their updated counterparts. </p>
<p>For example, this article about a <a href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/07/100-bonus-for-opening-a-chase-checking-account/">$100 bonus for opening a Chase checking account</a> was from January <em>2008</em>, but was still attracting many visits. From June 2009 through August 2009, it was 3.3% of the landing pages, which is pretty high for an outdated article from a year and a half ago. Not surprisingly, the bounce rate was around 50%. <span id="more-81"></span></p>
<p>The problem is that even though that promotion had ended a long time ago, there were other similar Chase promotions, even ones that were featured on the same blog. So, in a nutshell, the plan I came up with was this:
<ol>
<li>Look at your top Landing Pages, focusing on the high Bounce Rates</li>
<li>Read the content of the article, see if it&#8217;s out of date</li>
<li>Search the site for updated content in the same vein</li>
<li>Add a link from the old to the new, make sure it&#8217;s clear and obvious</li>
</ol>
<p>Consumerism Commentary has been running for over seven years, so it might seem like a daunting task to update all your old articles. But that&#8217;s the thing: you don&#8217;t need to update all of them, just the ones people are paying attention to. </p>
<p>Over the course of a couple hours, we added a little over 20 of these old-to-new links, and from September through November 2009, AdSense Revenue for the updated pages represented 3.5% of the total. Put another way, <strong>the site&#8217;s revenue is up 3.5% because of a handful of strategically-placed links</strong>.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t feel like you have the time to work up this strategy, or the skill to implement it, or to track it properly, I&#8217;ll be happy to help you. <a href="http://metricology.com/contact/">Send us a quick message</a> and let&#8217;s talk about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://metricology.com/2009/12/31/adsense-revenue-up-3-5-just-by-adding-links-to-updated-articles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if People are Misspelling Your Keywords?</title>
		<link>http://metricology.com/2009/10/05/what-if-people-are-misspelling-your-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://metricology.com/2009/10/05/what-if-people-are-misspelling-your-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan J Busch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian ibbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mispell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misspell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricology.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While reviewing the keywords that bring people to the Coverville Web site, I noticed two entries for the name of the host: Brian Ibbott. Unfortunately, the misspelling of his name—Brian Ibbot, with one t—was more popular in September 2009 than the correct spelling.

My knee-jerk reaction was to think, &#8220;Uh oh. People are misspelling his name. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While reviewing the keywords that bring people to the Coverville Web site, I noticed two entries for the name of the host: Brian Ibbott. Unfortunately, the misspelling of his name—Brian Ibbot, with one t—was more popular in September 2009 than the correct spelling.</p>
<p><img src="http://metricology.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ibbot-or-ibbott.jpg" alt="ibbot-or-ibbott" title="ibbot-or-ibbott" width="398" height="338" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-69" /></p>
<p>My knee-jerk reaction was to think, &#8220;Uh oh. People are misspelling his name. Are we accounting for that? Should we put the more popular misspelling in the meta keywords? Are people finding the wrong Brian Ibbott?&#8221;<span id="more-67"></span></p>
<p>But of course, after thinking it through, I remembered that this is what&#8217;s happening:
<ol>
<li>People are searching for &#8220;brian ibbot&#8221;</li>
<li>Search engines are attempting to correct the misspelling</li>
<li>People ignore the correction and click the thing they want</li>
</ol>
<p><img src="http://metricology.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/brian-ibbot-Google-Search.jpg" alt="brian ibbot - Google Search" title="brian ibbot - Google Search" width="495" height="245" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-70" /></p>
<p>(Thankfully, Google also attempts to correct the typo &#8220;covervillw&#8221;, which I admit I find myself typing sometimes.)</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t worry if people are misspelling your name: the good search engines are smart enough to know the difference. Of course, if there is a separate Brian Ibbot out there in the world, who also has a music podcast, our strategy might be different.</p>
<p>For more, see Vanessa Fox&#8217;s article: <a href="http://www.ninebyblue.com/blog/google-mispelling-match-a-tale-of-two-searches/">Google Misspelling Match: A Tale Of Two Searches</a>.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://coverville.com">Coverville is a well-respected and popular music podcast</a> for which I do some regular traffic analysis. The host has graciously allowed me to share specific findings with you.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://metricology.com/2009/10/05/what-if-people-are-misspelling-your-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Psychology of Completing a Visit</title>
		<link>http://metricology.com/2009/09/25/psychology-of-completing-a-visit/</link>
		<comments>http://metricology.com/2009/09/25/psychology-of-completing-a-visit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan J Busch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metricology.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you ask the right questions, and then compare answers from seemingly unrelated questions, you can learn some very interesting things. While it&#8217;s common sense that people will be unsatisfied with a site that operates slowly, I was surprised to learn that people who completed their visit actually viewed the site as responding faster than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you ask the right questions, and then compare answers from seemingly unrelated questions, you can learn some very interesting things. While it&#8217;s common sense that people will be unsatisfied with a site that operates slowly, I was surprised to learn that people who completed their visit actually viewed the site as responding faster than the average:</p>
<p><a href="http://metricology.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/performance.jpg"><img src="http://metricology.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/performance-532x362.jpg" alt="performance" title="performance" width="532" height="362" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-34" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://metricology.com/2009/09/25/psychology-of-completing-a-visit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
